Program > Papers by speaker > Lopez Jimmy

Tuesday 13
C1 - Education, development programs III
Chair: Joana Silva
› 9:50 - 10:15 (25min)
› Room 003 - G. Dandelot
Labour market regulations and capital labour sustitution
Gilbert Cette  1, 2@  , Jimmy Lopez  1, 3@  , Jacques Mairesse  4, 5@  
1 : Centre de recherche de la Banque de France  -  Website
Banque de France
31 rue Croix des petits champs 75001 PARIS - France -  France
2 : Aix-Marseille School of Economics  (AMSE)  -  Website
Ecole Centrale Marseille (ECM), Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS)
GREQAM, Centre de la Charité, 2 rue de la Charité, 13236 Marseille Cedex 02 -  France
3 : Laboratoire d'Economie de Dijon  (LEDi)  -  Website
Université de Bourgogne, CNRS : UMR6307, Inserm
Pôle d'économie et de gestion - 2 boulevard Gabriel - BP 26611 - 21066 DIJON CEDEX -  France
4 : Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique  (CREST)
INSEE Paris
5 : Maastricht University  -  Website
Universiteitssingel 40;6200 MD Maastricht -  Netherlands

On the basis of a country*industry unbalanced panel data sample for 14 OECD countries and 18 industries covering the years 1988 to 2007, this study proposes an econometric investigation of the effects of the OECD Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) indicator on four investment components of total capital and two skill components of total labour. Relying on a difference-in-difference econometric approach, we find that an increase in EPL has: (i) positive and significant effects on the non-ICT and construction capital - labor ratio and the share of high-skill labour; (ii) non-significant effects on the ICT capital – labour ratio; (iii) negative and significant effects on the R&D capital – labour ratio and the share of low-skilled labour. These results suggest that firms consider that the strenthening of Employment Protection Legislation is equivalent to a rise in the cost of labour, resulting in capital-to-labour substitution in favour of non-ICT and construction capital relatively to ICT and R&D capital, and working at the disadvantage of low-skill relatively to high-skill workers. They indicate to the contrary that structural reforms for more labour flexibility weakening this legislation could have a favourable impact on firms' R&D investment and their hiring of low-skill workers.



  • Other
Online user: 2